Mark Potts runs through the details of Philly.com's reborn commenting system, which takes a good-enough approach to the complex problem of encouraging conversation in a world where an unfortunate percentage of us are idiots. As I've said previously, pseudonymity is a reasonable Middle Way.
I've been down the Real Names path. It's not a bad one. But my next-door neighbor in White Bear Lake, Minnesota, was one of several hundred Tom Johnsons in the area, and my next-door neighbor in Marine on St. Croix, Minnesota, was one of several hundred Richard Johnsons. Sometimes handles can be more precise.
Notice to SEO spammers: This site integrates with the Mollom antispam database. Posting any kind of spam, including link SEO spam, is guaranteed to get your URL reported to Mollom. You may get past Mollom's CAPTCHA challenge, but your post will be removed and you will be reported.
Comments
Couldn't you have a hybrid system
Steve,
I see the issue with similar and exactly the same names but shouldn't it be possible to create a system that links back to the true identity as default even if you used a pseudonym or handle?
Eoin
Another way to handle it
At my day-job in Denver we just upgraded the forum software that powers our article comments. Before we had asked for people's real names when they signed up -- most people gave them. A handful were surprised that their full names were published alongside their comments.
With the upgrade I added functionality so that people can decide whether to display their full name, or just their initials. Most people are choosing initials. I don't have the numbers on how many more people are giving (what appears to be) their real name, but I think it's a pretty good way to handle identity.
Post new comment