<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.yelvington.com"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>yelvington.com - capitalism</title>
 <link>http://www.yelvington.com/taxonomy/term/174/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Are journalists anti-business?</title>
 <link>http://www.yelvington.com/20080203/are_journalists_antibusiness</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I was looking over Tim McGuire&#039;s syllabus for a class he&#039;s teaching at Arizona State, &lt;a href=&quot;http://cronkite.asu.edu/mcguireblog/?p=50#more-50&quot;&gt;Business and Future of Journalism,&lt;/a&gt; and one paragraph really caught my eye:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Every media person you meet will tell you the journalism world you stand to enter has changed profoundly. &lt;strong&gt;Much of the blame for that alleged change is laid at the doorstep of “the business side of journalism” and that phrase usually involves a snarl and some spit.&lt;/strong&gt; And yet any journalist worth any salt at all knows that it is essential that a successful business support quality journalism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Emphasis added.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are journalists anti-business? Back in the 20th century when I worked at the Minneapolis Star Tribune, where McGuire was editor, we made &quot;diversity&quot; a priority. I always thought our diversity goals weren&#039;t diverse enough, because they failed to address some glaring weaknesses in our newsroom culture. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of those weaknesses was a general lack of understanding of the business world -- not just the &quot;business side&quot; of newspapering, but all small and big business -- that sometimes bubbled up as the &quot;snarl and some spit&quot; that McGuire cites. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t buy the self-serving &quot;liberal media&quot; bleat that&#039;s been coming from crass right-wing politicians and performers for the last decade or so, but we should recognize our weaknesses and I think this business thing is one of them. I wonder if the &quot;separation of church and state&quot; that&#039;s part of the standard J-school indoctrination inadvertently contributes to it. After all, the opposite of sacred is profane.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or maybe it&#039;s simpler than that. We&#039;re all the product of our experiences. If you go to college, get a degree in journalism and set out to be a newspaper reporter, you&#039;re not living the same kind of life as the entrepreneur who&#039;s trying to meet a payroll and obligations. (I had a taste of that life early on, running a cluster of weeklies, and I can tell you it&#039;s not a bed of roses.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I have to applaud ASU for making this a required course. In struggling to understand the extraordinary business challenges faced by news companies today, these students may develop a framework that helps them do better journalism by understanding business in general throughout their careers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.yelvington.com/20080203/are_journalists_antibusiness#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.yelvington.com/blogs/bias">bias</category>
 <category domain="http://www.yelvington.com/blogs/business">business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.yelvington.com/blogs/capitalism">capitalism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.yelvington.com/blogs/entrepreneurship">entrepreneurship</category>
 <category domain="http://www.yelvington.com/blogs/journalism">journalism</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>yelvington</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">349 at http://www.yelvington.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

