Like a lot of people, I've been trying to puzzle out Google Video, which launched a week ago to a chorus of boos from reviewers. Apparently they were looking for iTunes-the-next-generation.
Lost Remote discovers that the New York Times has video and asks: "As television folks, shouldn’t our online video be better than that of our print brethren?"
I received some thoughtful email feedback to my best-case scenario, five years out item. Here's one point that I'd like to focus on: "Video and audio content generation will become a normal product of the papers. Non-printable media must become more prominent in the future."
I agree wholeheartedly. I'm just not sure what form it should or will take:
