As the bloodbath continues at America's big newspapers, name-brand columnists, movie and music reviewers are at the head of the line of those being thrown overboard. At my alma mater in the north, the Star Tribune, 25 percent of the news department and 40 percent of the editorial page are getting the axe. Many old friends are on that list.
Perhaps the cuts are being made in the wrong place. Instead of cutting staff, I propose cutting the editorial page -- the actual printed artifact, the thing that consumes trees, gasoline and oil, and clogs landfills. Send it the way of the dinosaurs, along with the stock listings, bridge column and TV grid. Save the newsprint, save the staff.
We need more intelligent discussion of civic affairs, not less. But killing trees and creating recycling problems is not the way to do it.
Let's say you're an editorial page editor. What could you do?
Notice to SEO spammers: This site integrates with the Mollom antispam database. Posting any kind of spam, including link SEO spam, is guaranteed to get your URL reported to Mollom. You may get past Mollom's CAPTCHA challenge, but your post will be removed and you will be reported.
Comments
"learn from The Guardian"
By this, do you mean "Learn from The Guardian that if you build a boxing ring and fill it full of aggressive, provocative and ignorant so-called commentators, you'll end up with a toxic troll-fest ripe for ad hominim attacks and flame wars that have no value for anyone whose head is not buried somewhere near their colon"?
I'd hardly hold Comment Is Free up as a bastion of good practice. Gamesblog, yes, but not that vile pit of bile that passes for 'comment' on CiF.
Otherwise, fab advice.
Post new comment